<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Anne Almasy on Inside That Ad</title><link>https://www.insidethatad.com/tags/anne-almasy/</link><description>Recent content in Anne Almasy on Inside That Ad</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.insidethatad.com/tags/anne-almasy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Anne Almasy Ad Rejected Initially</title><link>https://www.insidethatad.com/posts/annealmasy/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:18:08 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.insidethatad.com/posts/annealmasy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.insidethatad.com/img/2013/02/anne_almasy.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.insidethatad.com/img/2013/02/anne_almasy.jpg" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I saw this ad for &lt;a href="http://www.annealmasy.com"&gt;Anne Almasy&lt;/a&gt;, a wedding photographer on &lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/wedding-magazine-flip-flops-photographers-ad-showing-gay-couple-147381"&gt;Adfreak&lt;/a&gt; and I had to give my two-cents. The whole story was that Weddings Unveiled, a wedding magazine initially rejected (hence this post’s title) the ad because it featured a photo of two women about to kiss. The magazine then promptly received a strongly worded open letter pretty much calling the editors of the magazine spineless for following beliefs not even their own. The magazine backtracked and allowed Ms. Almasy to use the original photo.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>