<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agency.com on Inside That Ad</title><link>https://www.insidethatad.com/brand/agency.com/</link><description>Recent content in Agency.com on Inside That Ad</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.insidethatad.com/brand/agency.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Agency.com</title><link>https://www.insidethatad.com/posts/agency-com/</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.insidethatad.com/posts/agency-com/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adgabber.com/video/video"&gt;Find more videos like this on &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adgabber.com/video/video"&gt;AdGabber&lt;/a&gt;*
*
** So I found the infamous &lt;a href="http://insidethatad.blogspot.com/www.agency.com"&gt;Agency.com&lt;/a&gt; pitch viral video that they did for Subway via &lt;a href="http://insidethatad.blogspot.com/www.adrants.com"&gt;Adrants&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://insidethatad.blogspot.com/www.%20Adgabber.com"&gt;Adgabber&lt;/a&gt;. The only thing is I couldn’t understand what was so inappropriate about it. I understand that it seemed kind of dumb and may have embarrassed the client but I didn’t see anything offensive, did you guys? The article Adrants said, “They publicly masturbate but there was some backslapping. But people have to understand that the video is an agency pitch video so there has to be a congratulatory tone to the video. What do you guys think?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>